🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.